Freges Puzzle of Identity Statements Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Freges Puzzle of Identity Statements - Essay ExampleFriedrich Ludwig Gottlob Frege, a German philosopher, was one of the founder fathers of establishing a systematic and analytical approach to the philosophy of language. He instituted the idea of logically proving the quantified narrations. In Freges philosophy of language he found two puzzles, of which one related to the identicalness of statements. Frege says forthwith if we were to regard equality as a relation between that which the names a and b designate, it would seem that a = b could non differ from a = a (i.e. provided a = b is true). A relation would thereby be expressed of a thing to itself, and indeed one in which each thing stands to itself but to no other thing (Bencivenga E, 1993).Here, he observed that mere representation of names and descriptions does not convey the data content of a statement or a sentence in terms of logic and means. He further probed and found that a minimum of two relations are required for significant grounds of the language. In the subsequent paragraphs we will discuss the Freges Puzzle of identity statements in detail and reasonably prune the solution of the puzzle as suggested by Frege himself.Identity statements are the expressions that equate the objects on both sides of the identity sign (Geach, O. and Black, Max, 1960). For example, (2+3) = 5, Clint is Eastwood and John is Peters father. All these statements essentially belong to the alike clan of winsome a= b. The statement a = b can only hold true when a and b both represent the same object or an individual. Now, consider a statement of mannikin a = a. This statement also requires the same truth condition as required for the statement of kind a = b. For both the cases, object or the individual is same and also, the denotations represent the same individual or the object. However, the meaning conveyed in the two cases is varied. This appears to be a paradoxical situation as the representations of a uniq ue object or an individual have a difference while macrocosm true at the same time. The Freges puzzle states that when the difference in the representations, that is, a or b is not established by the two cases under consideration, then how we can find the difference in meaning or cognitive significance between the two true identity statements (Fiengo, Robert and May, Robert, 2006).Cognitive Significance of the leaving of Identity StatementsTo resolve the issue of difference, we first understand cognitive significance of a name or a statement. Cognitive significance of a statement, as brought out by Frege, can only be described by two important aspects of the statement, namely, sense and reference (Zalta, Edward N, 2005). Here, the sense of the statement conveys more information then its interpretation by mere visual inspection (Schirn, M, 1976). Moreover, sense is the integral part of the name and different names are associated with different sense (Zalta, Edward N, 2005). A group of two or more statements may indicate or refer to a singular object but each statement has a unique sense of its own.Next, we obtain the property between the